What does the 11th Circuit Federal Appeals Court mean by a "Mosaic of Circumstantial Evidence"?

The term "mosaic of circumstantial evidence" describes a situation where various pieces of indirect evidence, when considered together, create a comprehensive picture or pattern that supports a particular conclusion or inference.

In essence, rather than relying on direct evidence (such as eyewitness testimony or a confession), which may be lacking or inconclusive, a Plaintiff might build their case using multiple circumstantial pieces of evidence. Each piece alone might not definitively prove guilt, but collectively they paint a convincing picture of the defendant's involvement in the wrongdoing alleged in the lawsuit complaint.

The 11th Circuit Federal Appeals Court, like other courts, might consider such a "mosaic" when reviewing a lower court's decision. They would assess whether the Plaintiff presented enough circumstantial evidence to support the causes of action alleged in the lawsuit complaint.

If you or someone you know has experienced discrimination or harassment in the workplace, contact The Justice Law Firm, LLC today for a FREE consultation.